Charles Russell Speechlys Podcast Channel

In our second episode, Trevor Bettany, Sophie Lockwood and Amelia Goodwin look at the practice side of carrying out a redundancy exercise including making the announcement, collective and individual consultation, scoring and dismissal.

Boundary disputes often involve high levels of stress and costs.  The courts have made it clear that they would rather not deal with these types of dispute when their resources are so stretched, but the issues and evidence can be complex.  In this podcast, Emma Humphreys and Emma Preece are joined by Kerry Bretherton QC of Tanfield Chambers to explore whether it is possible to simplify boundary issues between warring parties and how to encourage people to “make love not war” over their boundary differences…!

In our first episode, Trevor Bettany and Clare Davis discuss the practical aspects of undertaking a redundancy exercise – looking at the theory, options for employers and what to take into account at the initial planning stages.

Successful procurement is more than the choice of the construction contract. Join Charles Russell Speechlys Partner, Fiona Edmond and Gardiner and Theobald Partner, John Meredith as they discuss some practical pre-tender tips for a successful project.

In the first of a series of our Property Patter podcasts looking at the different forms of tenant insolvency, Emma Humphreys is joined by Bethan Cunniffe and Sam Lear to look at some key points on tenant administration.  Listen in for the answers to FAQs including “What is the aim of an administration?”, “When is a “pre-pack” the preferred option?”, “What can and should landlords do when faced with a tenant in administration?” and “Why is an administration like bubble wrap?!”

In our first episode of Property Patter for 2021, Emma Humphreys and Laura Bushaway are joined by Guy Fetherstonhaugh QC and Toby Boncey of Falcon Chambers to look at what’s ahead in the world of property law during this year – including Parliament’s plans and coronavirus cases ranging from tenants challenging arrears claims to hotly contested disputes over the terms of renewal leases under the 1954 Act.  There are also plenty of “business as usual” property disputes for discussion – including consideration of the clarity we might get on the Electronic Communications Code this year and the differing court views when it comes to parties’ conduct and injunctions.

Emma Humphreys and Natalie Deuchar are joined by Joanne Wicks QC of Wilberforce Chambers to discuss two areas of property law they would like to see work better: section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 and section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927.   What are the problems with these rules?  Would amendment save them, or do they need sending to Room 101?  And are there any positives to take from 2020 as we head towards the New Year…?

Rachel sits down with leading Barrister, Kevin McCartney from 5 Paper Buildings, to discuss bribery and corruption from a criminal perspective. The pair will look at issues relating to bribery that can occur in business and take you through a case study outlining some potential pitfalls in business relationships.

This is the story of Heidi who is Swiss, and Henry, a Brit. In this podcast series we explore issues faced by this international couple, their businesses and their assets in a UK/Switzerland cross-border context. We will follow their story in good times and in bad times, to untangle the legal knots and help them spot opportunities.

Before Heidi and Henry “settle down”, they decide to go on a free-ride skiing adventure. Do they need Wills? What should these say? What happens following an accident if one of them survives, but loses mental capacity?

This is the story of Heidi who is Swiss, and Henry, a Brit. In this podcast series we explore issues faced by this international couple, their businesses and their assets in a UK/Switzerland cross-border context. We will follow their story in good times and in bad times, to untangle the legal knots and help them spot opportunities.

Before they tie the knot, Henry’s parents want him to have a ‘pre-nuptial agreement’, to protect family money in case of a divorce. Heidi’s family say this can be dealt with by electing into the appropriate ‘matrimonial property regime’. Are they both right and does it matter which country they get married in?